33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all make sure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Stacy, a tenant in a very duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not provided her enough notice before raising her rent, citing a completely new state legislation that requires a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
The ruling on the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts until eventually or Until possibly new legislation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
However it is made obvious that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also make sure regard from the family lose in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security on the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been achieved. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
During the United States, people are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember one particular rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as is possible, leading the court, not only to the case, but for the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
Because of this, basically citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the community looking to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s really worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this more info difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings within the Impugned order, after recording of evidence with the respective parties. Read more